Skip to content
Sunday, October 11, 2026
Gamora Land

The Venezuelan Crisis Could Now Define President Trump's Legacy - as well as the United States' Position in the Global Order

In the wake of executing a evening of shock and awe in Venezuela, Donald Trump now appears to be entering the state-building arena.

In a remarkable press conference at his Mar-a-Lago resort on Saturday morning, the president declared that US forces had successfully captured Venezuelan President Nicolas Maduro and his wife in an late-night operation in Caracas.

Trump then indicated that a delegation comprising Secretary of State Marco Rubio and Secretary of Defence Pete Hegseth, collaborating with Venezuelans, would be assuming control of the troubled nation.

"We are going to administer the country until such time as we can do a safe, proper and judicious transition," he said.

What precisely "running the country" entails is uncertain, but the commitment marks an sudden change of course for the president, laden with inconsistencies and formidable obstacles.

A leader who ran on opposing "endless conflicts", who vehemently denounced past US efforts at overthrowing governments and who promised to implement an "America First" foreign policy is now betting his presidency on effectively rebuilding a South American nation whose economy is collapsed and whose governmental stability has been eroded by decades of dictatorship.

Yet, Trump was persistently upbeat.

He said his administration has a "perfect track record of winning" – and that this will be no exception. He promised to enlist American energy companies to repair Venezuela's deteriorating industrial infrastructure, providing financing for the American reconstruction efforts and benefitting the Venezuelan people.

He did not exclude deploying American soldiers to Venezuela to progress these efforts. "We do not fear boots on the ground…we had boots on the ground last night," he informed reporters.

Trump, a sharp critic of the US intervention of Iraq, will now have to heed the words of one of the American architects of the Iraq War, Secretary of State Colin Powell: "You break it, you bought it."

A Shift in Foreign Policy

The US has altered Venezuela's destiny – whether for good or ill.

Trump took office nearly a year ago promising to be a peacemaker, but over the past year he has shown that he is quite prepared to use armed force around the globe.

In the past week, he ordered air strikes on Syria and Nigeria. In 2025, he targeted nuclear facilities in Iran, suspected narco-trafficking boats in the Caribbean, insurgent groups in Yemen, militias in Somalia and jihadist fighters in Iraq.

Unlike previous actions, which have largely involved rockets and warplanes that minimize the exposure of American forces to danger, Trump's Venezuela strike – and his pledges to the future of that nation – are strikingly different.

His objective, he said during his press conference, is to "make Venezuela great again."

Response at Home and Abroad

That play on Trump's "MAGA" – or Maga - mantra may be hard for some of Trump's followers to digest.

Congresswoman Marjorie Taylor Greene, a one-time Trump ally who broke with the president after accusing him of deserting his core supporters, was quick to denounce the president's actions on social media.

"Public outrage with our own government's never ending military aggression and backing for overseas conflicts is justified because we are forced to pay for it," she wrote. "This is what many in Maga thought they voted to end. Boy were we wrong."

Another notable Trump critic, Republican Congressman Thomas Massie, contrasted the official rationale for Maduro's arrest – on arms and cocaine trafficking charges – with Trump's reasoning that the operation was to reclaim seized US oil and stop fentanyl production.

The majority of Republican lawmakers stood by the president, with House Speaker Mike Johnson characterizing the military action against a "illegitimate government" as "decisive and justified".

Policy Rationales and Worldwide Consequences

During his appearance, the president said the Venezuelan operation advanced his "America First" priorities because it guaranteed US regional security and provided a reliable source of oil.

He resurrected the Monroe Doctrine – an nineteenth-century American diplomatic policy that asserted the Western Hemisphere should be free from influence by European powers – and rebranded it the "Trump Doctrine."

The move in Venezuela, Trump said, shows that "American dominance in the Western Hemisphere will not be questioned again."

The purpose of the new US national security strategy, he said, was to "protect commerce, territory and assets that are central to our security interests." He branded the Western Hemisphere as America's "sphere of influence."

Trump's decision to capture Maduro will raise broader questions in global politics, however, and affect American ties with the world's other major global powers.

The Chinese government released a statement voicing surprise and condemning what it said was a irresponsible assault on a sovereign nation.

During the previous administration, the US offered similar condemnations of Russia after its incursion of Ukraine. Now the Trump administration is attempting to mediate a ceasefire between those two nations – one that has frequently seemed to be leaning to the Russian side.

Don Bacon, a moderate Republican congressman, voiced worry about the precedent Trump's actions might send.

"My main concern is now Russia will use this to excuse their illegal and brutal military actions against Ukraine, or China to rationalize an attack of Taiwan."

Political Criticism and Constitutional Questions

Trump's Democratic opponents were sharper.

"The United States should not be administering other countries for any purpose," said a senator who serves on the Foreign Relations Committee. "We should have understood by now not to get entangled in perpetual conflicts and regime change missions that carry devastating consequences for Americans."

Another senior Democratic lawmaker said Maduro is a lawbreaker and a autocrat with a record of rights violations. But he condemned Trump's decision not to inform congressional leaders prior to initiating the attack.

"Donald Trump has the constitutional responsibility to abide by the law and protect democratic norms in the United States," he said. "That is what putting America First demands."

Trump, in his press conference, explained that he chose not to inform Congress because he was concerned they would "disclose" particulars of the operation prior to the attack.

A Path Forward Shrouded in Doubt

That military operation was a success – with no American casualties and minimal damage to US assets. Trump, with his characteristic confidence, described the operation as a "spectacular assault" and "one of the most astonishing, effective and impressive displays of American military might and proficiency in US history."

Now he is gambling his presidency on that success continuing, as the US claims it will assume responsibility for administering and reconstructing Venezuela - though what that truly entails remains unknown. He and his team must fortify a nation that has been in chaos for decades while stabilising a hemisphere that is bound to be cautious of what Trump's foreign policy has planned for them.

TG
About the author

Taylor Griffin

Maya is a passionate gaming journalist with over a decade of experience covering the UK gaming scene and indie game developments.

Gamora Land

Type to search articles.